EDA's Contribution to Semiconductor and Electronic System Industries

Semiconductor Review | Thursday, March 02, 2023

The electronic design automation (EDA) industry is experiencing strong financial growth and is making a vital contribution to the success of much larger semiconductor and electronic systems industries.

FREMONT, CA: Throughout the past few years, there has been considerable progress in both system design automation in general and electrical design automation in particular. The systems have become progressively more capable and potent as a result. Electronic systems are becoming more and more common, which is due to several variables including, but not limited to, shrinking processing technologies, improved design processes, better tools, effective protocols, and ever-improving system optimization models.

The enhanced systems have altered how people view their life. For instance, modern mobile gadgets are more powerful in terms of computation than supercomputers from a few decades ago. Electronic systems' great rise in popularity and power has come at the expense of their design processes becoming ever more complex.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Due to numerous new applications, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies is expanding quickly. As a result, chip manufacturers must create more intricate integrated circuits (ICs), such as CPUs and GPUs with hundreds of cores, terabytes of memory, and numerous high-speed communication channels. Additionally, they call for more complex EDA tools. Also, programmers frequently see the necessity to create specific logic and algorithms to maximise AI performance without sacrificing power consumption. For the appropriate AI architecture, EDA tools must operate at higher abstraction levels.

While EDA may aid in the design of AI solutions, AI can also enhance EDA tools. EDA providers have recently started incorporating AI and ML into their EDA solutions. ML can improve EDA performance since it needs a lot of data to work well, and EDA generates a lot of data.

Domain-specific design

The move towards domain-specific architectures is causing EDA tool manufacturers to rush to streamline and improve current approaches and tools. For applications in hyper-scale computing, automotive, mobile, communications, aerospace/defence, industrial, and medical fields, there is a drive for designs that are best suited for these fields. Shorter development cycles, higher system complexity, performance and cost trade-offs, and design for context are the driving forces behind domain-specific design. The ecosystem's component, subsystem, and system developers are working more closely to address these difficulties, which EDA vendors and users believe will improve performance.

Several opportunities for EDA tool providers are associated with this trend.

Professionals can work successfully and efficiently during the design and test phases owing to the development of collaborative workflows, which also improve process, data, and intellectual property management (IP). Model-based system engineering (MBSE), with hierarchical design and various levels of accuracy depending on the simulation type, is used by vendors of EDA tools (circuit, system, or network). Simulator accuracy has increased thanks to enhanced models, including measurement-based models. With realistic simulations earlier in the design phase, development teams may lower the risks associated with validation and verification as well as iterative and expensive physical prototyping. Cloud parallelisation and high-performance computing (HPC) have enhanced the potential for enhancing simulation accuracy and speed.

EDA suppliers should develop strong connections and interoperability between EDA, computer-aided design, and computer-aided engineering technologies as part of design-for-context. EDA tools should be connected with product lifecycle management systems, and simulation and test procedures should be enhanced, for a rise in productivity.

Miniaturisation

The process of miniaturisation involves shrinking the size of electronic parts, gadgets, or systems. The need for increasingly compact and portable electronic gadgets, as well as the need to cut costs and improve functionality, are the driving forces behind it. Electronic gadgets and parts are becoming smaller, making it possible to produce small, light items that are easier for consumers to use and transport. Smaller and more effective components, like microprocessors, sensors, and actuators, have been made possible by continuous improvements in microfabrication methods and materials. Electronic gadgets may now be produced in smaller and more powerful sizes than ever before as a result.

A wide range of electronic gadgets, including smartphones, computers, wearables like fitness trackers, medical equipment, and even satellites, provide examples. The development of new technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT) and micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), which are used in a variety of applications including healthcare, transportation, and smart homes, has also been made possible by the shrinking of electronic components. It is also possible to use miniaturisation to enhance the functionality of electrical equipment. For instance, by making electronic components smaller, it is possible to shorten the distance that signals must travel within a device, which can result in faster processing and higher power efficiency.

5G and Edge computing

The fifth generation of mobile networks, or 5G, provides greater capacity, reduced latency, and quicker speeds than earlier generations. It is made to enable a variety of new services and applications, including the Internet of Things, autonomous vehicles, and virtual and augmented reality (IoT). The simultaneous connection of a significantly greater number of devices to the internet via 5G networks will enable the development of new goods and services. In essence, it provides support for those electronic gadgets, and as they advance, they need more assistance.

A form of distributed computing known as edge computing pushes computer power closer to the network's edge, where data is generated. In typical cloud computing, data is transmitted to a centralised data centre for processing; this is in contrast. Since it lowers latency and guarantees effective use of the 5G network, edge computing is essential for 5G.

Green electronics

Often referred to as sustainable electronics, Green electronics indicates the development of electronic systems and gadgets that are resource-efficient and friendly to the environment. It aims to lessen the impact that electronic devices have on the environment throughout every stage of their lifecycle, from the sourcing of raw materials to end-of-life product disposal. Green electronics can have an impact on electronic design in several significant areas. The use of ecologically friendly materials in the manufacture of electrical devices is one of these areas. For instance, materials that are free of hazardous chemicals or that are simple to recycle or repurpose after their useful lives can be used by electronic designers.

More in News

PCB design software is now becoming increasingly inseparable from workforce issues for electronics companies. This challenge goes beyond having access to a good platform for engineers; many organizations find themselves facing problems when trying to adopt software due to their inability to recruit experienced PCB experts or provide proper training programs. This challenge tends to appear most strongly in companies scaling up electronics capabilities with limited hardware design teams in place. PCB designs continue requiring highly specialized skills, particularly when it comes to routing, signal integrity and manufacturing processes that might not be immediately obvious at earlier stages of the process. The increased complexity of software plays a big role here as well. Some PCB design environments incorporate extensive feature sets that have been gradually built up over years in the industry, meaning that veteran engineers can easily feel at home in them while relatively new professionals find difficulty adjusting to the workflow of such systems. This challenge creates an interesting disconnect between software features and engineering teams' ability to adopt the platform effectively. Managers who invest money in state-of-the-art software often find out that the time required for onboarding is longer than anticipated or that a few senior PCB designers end up being involved in almost all key layout-related decisions. These issues have a significant impact on how electronics organizations are preparing for product development in terms of staff planning. Companies are competing more than ever to recruit engineers who are comfortable with moving from schematic designs to layout reviews and further to manufacturing without undergoing extensive training programs. PCB software skills are now becoming an important topic in recruitment interviews rather than just preferences of engineers. Training issues themselves create further challenges for electronics organizations in their efforts to scale up their capabilities. Mentorship has always been a major aspect of developing PCB skills, yet shorter deadlines make it more difficult to engage experienced workers in the process of onboarding new recruits who can take over their jobs in a year or two. Collaboration through remote channels has also made a difference, since it enables electronics companies to become more flexible when recruiting talent, but reduces interactions through which newer employees could gain insight into layout-related processes or manufacturing issues that emerge during project implementation. Some electronics organizations respond to such challenges by limiting the complexity of some parts of the workflow or restricting software usage to essential features available for broad implementation across teams. Others continue prioritizing highly specialized design environments despite their longer onboarding process needs. Software vendors might find themselves under greater pressure related to user interface, features and training as a consequence of current workforce-related concerns among buyers. Those companies will start focusing more on how long it takes to turn new recruits into productive members of the design team independent of experienced engineers. It seems that these workforce challenges cannot go away anytime soon. The PCB designing process remains highly technical and tightly connected with manufacturing requirements, meaning that electronics organizations have to be careful not to simplify everything too much. Still, the discourse surrounding PCB software adoption is beginning to extend into a discussion of workforce issues. ...Read more
PCB software purchasing processes have become more focused on preparation for manufacturing, at least among businesses working in a tight development schedule and producing fewer prototypes per cycle. Its an indication of growing concern regarding a practical situation within the industry. Completion of a design no longer means it will be manufactured efficiently. Engineering teams spend more time checking whether design outputs and documentation provide a clean transfer without requiring further clarification from manufacturers. It has been an ongoing problem. The recent state of production, however, seems to draw attention to the consequences. Component swapping, procurement complications, and fabrication schedule changes can reveal gaps in the documentation process that would otherwise go unnoticed under normal production conditions. Purchasing conversations related to PCB software have begun addressing the issue. Design tools that allow to update the bill of materials, provide consistent fabrication outputs, and communicate design rules effectively across teams are being prioritized. Software is judged based on the amount of ambiguity it leaves after design and before production. It creates even greater pressure for small-volume PCB manufacturing. Independent electronics developers and specialized device designers frequently work with external fabrication vendors that produce devices for multiple clients at once. In such a setting, poor documentation can lead to a rapid drop in priority. The issue is further complicated by emerging problems with component procurement. Routing and board redesign due to sourcing requirements may impact the size, thermal properties, and other factors that need to be considered throughout the rest of the development process. Software environments lacking proper revision tracking may introduce complications with understanding which designs and outputs need to be applied. Such discussions have expanded beyond individual engineers' concerns to cover overall team experience. A successful completion of the layout work does not automatically guarantee smooth production. Many cases have seen manufacturing teams identify preventable errors during their reviews. In certain settings, such incidents can be attributed to software workflow problems. There are also financial ramifications. A delay in the prototype creation may interfere with testing schedules and customer demonstrations. In such a case, a design system capable of minimizing production-related clarifications may be considered more valuable than one providing additional features that engineers never use. The competitive environment in the industry is likely to change as a result. Feature enhancement is traditionally the cornerstone of vendor strategy when selling a PCB solution. Some potential customers, however, place greater value on consistent preparation for manufacturing than in increasingly complex design tools. It does not necessarily mean the advanced features lose importance. There remains a high demand for comprehensive simulation and layout management for complex electronics. Still, many users care about their consistency rather than capabilities. Overall, there is an emerging shift in value assessment criteria. Instead of evaluating performance in the engineering department, the discussion begins addressing productivity issues during production, communication with the supplier, and revision tracking. ...Read more
Shrinking timelines for hardware engineering have arrived in areas where many teams developing printed circuit boards do not feel prepared. Revisions of the product that took longer times to make and move to manufacturing review are expected to be completed far faster, particularly in industries with electronics associated with connected devices, industrial equipment or compact consumer devices. These conditions are changing expectations of PCB design solutions. Customers are looking carefully at the speed of moving design modifications across stages of layout reviews, simulations and fabrication preparation without producing new verification bottlenecks further down the road. This does not relate to the need to incorporate additional capabilities into design platforms; the goal here is the reduction of bottlenecks between stages already stuffed with dependencies. Increasingly dense circuitry designs, higher density of component placement and greater interplay between electrical and mechanical engineering teams cause delays when it comes to handling revisions. Engineering teams used to thinking of PCB design platforms as tools for drafting the layout now pay more attention to the software as a layer of coordination between decisions about the layout and the schedule for production. This affects software purchasing conversations in practical terms. Workflows for importing designs, managing revisions and matching manufacturing needs now play a more significant role, as redesign iterations are becoming costly. Small hardware companies seem particularly susceptible to this trend. Big corporations can cover additional verification rounds with engineering capacity, while smaller operations are forced to rely on a few experts who will perform layout validation, comply with requirements and arrange fabrication in parallel. Any delay in handing off the design will cause the postponement of procurement or prototyping by days or even weeks. PCB solution vendors find themselves dealing with more divided audiences as well. While some customers seek simulation capabilities, others will look for consistent output or a strong library management system. These differences have produced a fragmentation in the industry because each engineering challenge has its own definition of what a streamlined process looks like. A new problem has appeared regarding onboarding. Experienced engineers are still hard to replace, although some software requires high levels of familiarity with the workflow. Training time has become a factor in evaluating solutions for PCB design, particularly for electronics engineering teams that include embedded software developers or people responsible for production. Distributed engineering also complicates matters. Reviews of the printed circuit board layout could involve employees operating from different locations or independent contractors working on a limited basis. Software platforms that confuse the user on versioning or the owner of a particular design can introduce issues in fabrication reviews, which are detected much later down the line. None of this means that there is an impending revolution coming to the PCB design solutions segment. Many teams prefer well-established design platforms and are reluctant to change their existing workflow. The work with the layout is too close to fabrication for electronics engineering teams to replace existing solutions easily. Nevertheless, conversations about PCB design software are starting to go beyond the questions of interfaces or feature sets. Engineering deadlines vary considerably across electronic markets, which prompts discussions of whether there might be too much room for delays in design processes. ...Read more
Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are redefining possibilities across high-precision industries and scientific fields. Known for their exceptional control and minimal heat impact, these lasers enable clean, accurate processing of delicate materials and biological tissues. Their applications span from advanced micromachining to groundbreaking medical procedures and ultrafast scientific experiments. By offering unmatched precision and versatility, ultrashort laser pulses are becoming essential tools in driving innovation, efficiency, and discovery in modern technology and research. Precision in Micromachining and Material Processing Ultrashort laser pulse solutions are transforming the field of micromachining and advanced material processing. These lasers emit pulses measured in femtoseconds or picoseconds, allowing them to interact with materials in an extremely controlled and localized manner. Because the energy is delivered in such short bursts, there is minimal heat transfer to the surrounding area. This results in high-precision cutting, drilling, or structuring without causing thermal damage or creating unwanted deformations on sensitive substrates. This level of precision is particularly beneficial for industries working with delicate or composite materials, including medical devices, semiconductors, and aerospace components. Renesas Electronics Corporation supports advanced semiconductor development through integrated hardware, software, and system design capabilities. For instance, in electronic manufacturing, ultrashort laser pulses can create micro-holes and intricate patterns in thin films and multilayered boards without impacting adjacent structures. This capability supports ongoing miniaturization efforts while preserving the integrity and performance of critical components. These laser solutions are ideal for processing transparent or brittle materials like glass, sapphire, and ceramics. Traditional methods often struggle with these materials due to cracking or chipping, but ultrashort pulses can process them cleanly and efficiently. The non-thermal interaction mechanism allows for superior surface quality and edge sharpness, making this technology a key enabler of next-generation precision manufacturing. Miller Sales Engineering supports precision manufacturing through engineered solutions that enhance component performance, reliability, and process efficiency. Advances in Medical and Scientific Applications Ultrashort laser pulse technology is also making significant contributions in medical procedures and scientific research. In the biomedical field, these lasers are used in procedures requiring extreme accuracy, such as eye surgeries and microscale tissue ablation. The ultrashort pulse duration promotes faster healing, minimizes collateral damage to surrounding tissues, and reduces the risk of complications. Surgeons and researchers benefit from the high level of control, which is essential when working in sensitive biological environments. In scientific research, ultrashort laser pulses are enabling breakthroughs in imaging, spectroscopy, and diagnostics. They are used to generate high-resolution images at the cellular or even molecular level, helping scientists understand biological processes in unprecedented detail. Their ability to produce high peak intensities also makes them useful for nonlinear optical experiments, where multiple photons are absorbed simultaneously to reveal information that is not accessible through conventional light sources. These laser systems are used in time-resolved studies to observe ultrafast phenomena, such as electron movement and chemical reactions. Researchers can use this data to develop more efficient materials, study complex biological systems, or enhance drug development. By delivering extremely short, high-intensity light pulses, ultrashort laser technology opens new frontiers in precision and discovery across disciplines. ...Read more